Appendicectomies at a tertiary hospital: disease profile and surgical practices at Grey’s Hospital, Pietermaritzburg

  • Kalenga N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The cause of acute appendicitis is probably multifactorial, and perforation may occur as the disease progresses. Appendicectomy is the treatment of choice and is increasingly being performed laparoscopically. Objectives: To determine the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristic, the commonest surgical approach, the prevalence of diagnostic inaccuracy and the association between perforated appendicitis and gender and age. Methods: A retrospective review of the medical records of 196 patients diagnosed with appendicitis at Grey’s hospital over an 18-month period was conducted. Data was collected on demographics, surgical approach, histology findings and complications. Results: Of the 196 patients, the mean age was 21.1 years, 54% were perforated, and the incidence of complicated appendicitis was highest at the extreme ages. Three surgical approaches were used: midline laparotomy (61.7%), Lanz incision (27.6%) and laparoscopy (10.7%). Bowel resection with primary anastomosis and stoma formation were done on 1.5% and 0.84% of cases respectively, while the abdomen was left open in 3.6% of cases. Although laparotomy was used for suspected perforated appendicitis, a small percentage of those who had midline laparotomy were, intraoperatively, found to have non-perforated appendicitis. Laparoscopic surgery was only used in a few selected cases of non-perforated appendicitis. The overall post-operative ICU admission was 9.7%. Conclusion: The majority of cases were perforated appendicitis. Midline laparotomy was the most preferred surgical approach despite its

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kalenga, N. C. (2017). Appendicectomies at a tertiary hospital: disease profile and surgical practices at Grey’s Hospital, Pietermaritzburg. Open Access Journal of Surgery, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.19080/oajs.2017.02.555592

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free