In part 1 of this series, the authors describe the importance of incomplete data in clinical research, and provide a conceptual framework for handling incomplete data by describing typical mechanisms and patterns of censoring, and detailing a variety of relatively simple methods and their limitations. In part 2, the authors will explore multiple imputation (MI), a more sophisticated and valid method for handling incomplete data in clinical research. This article will provide a detailed conceptual framework for MI, comparative examples of MI versus naive methods for handling incomplete data (and how different methods may impact subsequent study results), plus a practical user's guide to implementing MI, including sample statistical software MI code and a deidentified precoded database for use with the sample code.
CITATION STYLE
Newgard, C. D., & Haukoos, J. S. (2007). Advanced Statistics: Missing Data in Clinical Research—Part 2: Multiple Imputation. Academic Emergency Medicine, 14(7), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb01856.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.