Advanced Statistics: Missing Data in Clinical Research—Part 2: Multiple Imputation

  • Newgard C
  • Haukoos J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In part 1 of this series, the authors describe the importance of incomplete data in clinical research, and provide a conceptual framework for handling incomplete data by describing typical mechanisms and patterns of censoring, and detailing a variety of relatively simple methods and their limitations. In part 2, the authors will explore multiple imputation (MI), a more sophisticated and valid method for handling incomplete data in clinical research. This article will provide a detailed conceptual framework for MI, comparative examples of MI versus naive methods for handling incomplete data (and how different methods may impact subsequent study results), plus a practical user's guide to implementing MI, including sample statistical software MI code and a deidentified precoded database for use with the sample code.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Newgard, C. D., & Haukoos, J. S. (2007). Advanced Statistics: Missing Data in Clinical Research—Part 2: Multiple Imputation. Academic Emergency Medicine, 14(7), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb01856.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free