A comparison of three methods of DNA extraction from bone and tooth samples

  • Miyata T
  • Ishikawa H
  • Nakanishi H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

DNA obtained from hard tissues, such as bones and teeth, is used to identify highly decomposed or skeletonized corpses. EŠective DNA extraction is critical; the quantity and quality of DNA and the levels of co-extracted PCR inhibitors greatly in‰uence subsequent steps. We evaluated three methods used to extract DNA from bones and teeth: use of the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen), the standard phenol/ chloroform-based method, and the PrepFiler Express BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientiˆc). We modiˆed the protocols of the two kits. We assessed DNA quantity and quality. The QIAamp DNA Mini Kit yielded more DNA and more informative STR proˆles than did the other methods; that kit is optimal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miyata, T., Ishikawa, H., Nakanishi, H., & Ohmori, T. (2020). A comparison of three methods of DNA extraction from bone and tooth samples. Japanese Journal of Forensic Science and Technology, 25(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.3408/jafst.765

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free