DNA obtained from hard tissues, such as bones and teeth, is used to identify highly decomposed or skeletonized corpses. EŠective DNA extraction is critical; the quantity and quality of DNA and the levels of co-extracted PCR inhibitors greatly in‰uence subsequent steps. We evaluated three methods used to extract DNA from bones and teeth: use of the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen), the standard phenol/ chloroform-based method, and the PrepFiler Express BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientiˆc). We modiˆed the protocols of the two kits. We assessed DNA quantity and quality. The QIAamp DNA Mini Kit yielded more DNA and more informative STR proˆles than did the other methods; that kit is optimal.
CITATION STYLE
Miyata, T., Ishikawa, H., Nakanishi, H., & Ohmori, T. (2020). A comparison of three methods of DNA extraction from bone and tooth samples. Japanese Journal of Forensic Science and Technology, 25(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.3408/jafst.765
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.