What we talk about when we talk about love: A duoethnographic exploration of the dissertation relationship

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the aftermath and mop-up following a successful dissertation defense, an unintended and unexpected data source remained unexplored and unanalyzed: 32 audio-recorded discussions and work sessions documenting the processes, approaches, and decisions made by a dissertation director and his doctoral candidate. What might those conversations reveal about the dissertation relationship? Taking a page from Raymond Carver’s short story, “What We Talk about When We Talk about Love," we wondered what we might have been talking about when we were talking about dissertation writing. Inspired and shaped by Norris, Sawyer, and Lund’s (2012. Duoethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.) duoethnographic methods, this study provides opportunity for us to not just look back on the journey, but pushes us into the messiness of “recalling and reconceptualizing” (p. 10). As we each “become the foil for the Other, challenging the Other to reflect on their own life in a deeper, more relational, and authentic manner” (Norris et al., 2012, p. 10) we also interrogate and trouble our own simplistic categories of analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Helfenbein, R. J., & Adams, S. R. (2016). What we talk about when we talk about love: A duoethnographic exploration of the dissertation relationship. In Interdisciplinary Reflective Practice through Duoethnography: Examples for Educators (pp. 121–139). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51739-5_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free