Prone PNL: Is it still the gold standard? Review and results

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Conventionally PNL is performed with the patient in the prone position, and the present chapter reviews the “classic” standard technique in this position. Prone PNL has proven to be effective and safe in all situations, in spite of the potential advantages of the supine PNL. Its indications are identical in any position and can also be expanded, exploiting the advent of the mini-PNL approach. The option of simultaneous retrograde access makes supine position an interesting alternative for selected cases, although nowadays prone PNL can still be considered the gold standard.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knoll, T. (2014). Prone PNL: Is it still the gold standard? Review and results. In Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and ECIRS: The New Way of Interpreting PNL (pp. 89–97). Springer-Verlag France. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0459-0_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free