Getting Out of the Classroom and Into Nature: A Systematic Review of Nature-Specific Outdoor Learning on School Children's Learning and Development

50Citations
Citations of this article
338Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The value of natural environments for developing children's self-identity and social skills has been known for some time, and more recently the potential of nature-specific (i.e., excluding built environments) outdoor learning for achieving academic outcomes has been explored. Connecting children with natural spaces has been shown to benefit their physical and mental health; however, the utility of nature-specific outdoor environments as a setting for curricular and non-curricular learning has yet to be clearly established. Our aim was to undertake a narrative synthesis of international evidence of nature-specific outdoor learning and its benefits for personal and social development, wellbeing and academic progress. Methods: This systematic review searched publications between 2000 and 2020 in nine academic databases for evidence of socio-emotional and academic benefits of nature-specific outdoor learning in school-aged educational settings, using concise search criteria registered with PROSPERO. The total search results of 17,886 records were initially screened by title, and then two reviewers made blind reviews of the title and abstract of 1,019 records. Results: 147 original research studies meeting the criteria were identified. Learning settings ranged across outdoor adventure education, school gardens, field trips, and traditional school subjects taught in natural environments. Study characteristics were summarized, and risk-of-bias tools assessed quality of research as generally moderate, although with a wide range. The reported benefits of learning in natural outdoor settings include: increased student engagement and ownership of their learning, some evidence of academic improvement, development of social and collaborative skills, and improved self-concept factors. Conclusions: Nature-specific outdoor learning has measurable socio-emotional, academic and wellbeing benefits, and should be incorporated into every child's school experience with reference to their local context. Teacher pre-service and in-service education needs to include a focus on how natural settings can be used effectively for learning. Further research is needed to clarify the conditions under which specific forms of outdoor learning are most efficacious for various target outcomes. It is recommended that future studies measuring outdoor learning adopt established methodologies to improve the quality of research in this field. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=153171.

References Powered by Scopus

Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being

26917Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adventure education and outward bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference

529Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The power of play: A pediatric role in enhancing development in young children

435Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nature Nurtures Authenticity: Mechanisms and Consequences

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physical-Literacy-Enriched Physical Education: A Capabilities Perspective

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The existence of environmental education in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mann, J., Gray, T., Truong, S., Brymer, E., Passy, R., Ho, S., … Cowper, R. (2022, May 16). Getting Out of the Classroom and Into Nature: A Systematic Review of Nature-Specific Outdoor Learning on School Children’s Learning and Development. Frontiers in Public Health. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.877058

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 47

55%

Lecturer / Post doc 21

24%

Researcher 11

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 16

31%

Psychology 15

29%

Environmental Science 13

25%

Arts and Humanities 8

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 12
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 123

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free