Redirecting library and documentary affects: From libraries to “liferaries”

1Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, affects are discussed as forces or intensive powers causing movements in individuals and groups and their subsequent social, cultural, and material (together and in sum, political) expressions.1 The article suggests that the movements we should try to produce or support through libraries and other documentary institutions are movements of change toward longer-lasting and more sustainable affects that support life. It is desirable to adopt a production and reproduction model in libraries and documentation centers based on supporting institutional and individual agents that can modulate affects and redirect and create new trajectories toward responding to dire planetary and human needs that are now denied and repressed. This suggests that such institutions may wish to further critically examine how they reflect and how they direct and modulate epistemic and social forces, which forces they act upon and support, and which agents and powers they empower and to what degree they do so, toward long-term generative production and reproduction.

References Powered by Scopus

`Conduit metaphor' and the nature and politics of information studies

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Affective labor, resistance, and the academic librarian

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Obsolescence in subject description

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

From nostalgia to knowledge: Considering the personal dimensions of data lifecycles

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Day, R. E. (2020). Redirecting library and documentary affects: From libraries to “liferaries.” Library Trends, 68(3), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2020.0007

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

63%

Arts and Humanities 3

38%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0