Sustainable development and hazards mitigation in the United States: Disasters by design revisited

1Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It has become clear that natural and related technological hazards and disasters are not problems that can be solved in isolation. The occurrence of disasters is a symptom of broader and more basic social problems. Since 1994, a team of over 100 expert academics and practitioners-including members of the private sector-have assessed, evaluated, and summarized knowledge about natural and technological hazards in the United States from the perspectives of the physical, natural, social, behavioral, and engineering sciences. The major thesis of the findings was losses from hazards and inability to comprehensively reduce losses of all types are the consequences of narrowand shortsighted development patterns, cultural premises, and attitudes toward the natural environment, science, and technology. To address these broad and basic problems, the study included proposals for ways in which people and the institutions of the United States can take responsibility for disaster losses, reduce future hazard losses, and link hazard mitigation to sustainable development. © 2005 Springer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mileti, D. S., & Gailus, J. L. (2005). Sustainable development and hazards mitigation in the United States: Disasters by design revisited. In Mitigation of Natural Hazards and Disasters: International Perspectives (pp. 159–172). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4514-X_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free