The Doubter

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the heyday of philosophy of sciencephilosophy ofscience in the last century, special philosophies of science such as philosophy of physicsphilosophy ofphysics, philosophy of biologyphilosophy ofbiology, philosophy of mathematicsphilosophy ofmathematics, and others branched from the general philosophy of science. Philosophy of medicinephilosophy ofmedicine, which has existed since HippocratesHippocrates and GalenGalen as casual philosophizing about medical issues, also emerged as a field of scholarly research in the 1920s. It counted, and continues to count, as one of the special philosophies of science. We should be aware, however, that philosophy of medicine is, strictly speaking, neither a philosophy of science nor philosophy of a science. It is in fact philosophia universalisphilosophia universalis and not confined to medicine as a science or merely to scientific problems and issues in medicine. Beside genuinely metatheoretical concerns such as medical epistemology and medical concept formation, it also inquires into object-theoretical issues such as organism, life, death, suffering, disease, diagnostic-therapeutic methodology, caring and curing, personhood, mind, anthropology, human values, deontics, and so on. In this capacity, it convincingly demonstrates that medicine could serve as a highly fertile ground both for philosophy in general and philosophy of science in particular.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sadegh-Zadeh, K. (2012). The Doubter. In Philosophy and Medicine (Vol. 113, pp. 815–817). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2260-6_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free