Influence of neighbourhoods on the extent and compactness of tropical tree crowns and root systems

Abstract

Key message: Though competition operates distinctly above and below ground, competition with near neighbours explained more variation in crown and root system morphology of young tropical trees than did abiotic conditions. Abstract: Comparisons of above- and below-ground tree architecture and variation remain scarce in the literature of competition dynamics in forests. Trees compete above and below ground with neighbours, but the extent of such a neighbourhood and the relative importance of above- or below-ground neighbours in determining tree growth rates remain poorly understood. We combined terrestrial laser scans and a root excavation campaign in the tropical planted Sardinilla forest experiment with annual diameter-at-breast height measurements to test how the crowns and root systems of five tropical tree species (N = 128) varied with biotic neighbourhood and abiotic environmental characteristics. Crown and root system extent were compared, and the Hegyi competition index calculated at three spatial scales was regressed on focal tree biomass. We identified which neighbourhood and environmental variables explained most of the variation in mean crown and root system extent and compactness (a measure of morphological homogeneity) at the plot level and for species separately. Root systems were 2.6 ± 1.1 times wider than crowns on average and focal tree biomass was the best predicted by competition with near neighbours. At the plot level, more variation in crown and root system traits was explained by biotic than abiotic characteristics (65.8 and 26.0%, respectively). More intense competition in the near neighbourhood reduced crown extent of one study species (Anacardium excelsum) and root system extent of 4 out of 5 study species, and it also led to more compact crowns and root systems of Tabebuia rosea. After accounting for spatial autocorrelation in focal tree location, soil nitrogen concentration was not found to significantly affect the studied morphological traits. These results emphasize the role of competition in determining tree morphology generally, while also supporting the claim that competition operates distinctly above and below ground.