“Spirituality” and Mysticism

  • Klein C
  • Silver C
  • Streib H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationship between the self-rating as “spiritual” and mysticism as measured by Hood’s Mysticism Scale. The introduction provides an overview of recent attempts to measure “spirituality” psychometrically, of the theoretical and empirical approaches to mysticism and already empirically observed relations between mysticism and “spirituality.” Many scales trying to operationalize “spirituality” lack a solid conceptual background and convincing empirical validity. Citing the work of Stace and James , Hood constructed a scale that provides detailed and measurable descriptions of mystical experiences , the Mysticism Scale. Since the Mysticism Scale measures varieties of personal experiences of unity with some kind of transcendence, it proves to be an excellent measure for what many people today call “spirituality.” This can be shown empirically by utilizing the three factor solution of the M-Scale , identified as introvertive, extrovertive, and interpretive mysticism, in structural equation models exploring the relationships between mysticism and self-rated “spirituality” as well as self-rated “religion.” This chapter concludes by arguing that “spirituality” may be the product of experiences that can be described in terms of mysticism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klein, C., Silver, C. F., Streib, H., Hood, R. W., & Coleman III, T. J. (2016). “Spirituality” and Mysticism. In Semantics and Psychology of Spirituality (pp. 165–187). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free