New Directions and Alternative Approaches to the Measurement of Emotional Intelligence

  • Orchard B
  • MacCann C
  • Schulze R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Our aim in the current chapter is to evaluate the existing approaches for measuring EI and suggest some new ones, perhaps providing a clearer path for our apocryphal test developer. Currently, there are two basic varieties of measurement tools used to assess emotional intelligence: (1) the typical performance, self-report, scales; and (2) the maximum performance, ability, scales. In this chapter, we first outline the logic for evaluating validity evidence for EI tests, arguing that the self-report scales should not be labeled as if they could be used to validly assess emotional intelligence. We also evaluate the Multi-Factor Emotional Intelligence Scale (MSCEIT) subtests using the same criteria, pointing out some strengths and weaknesses of this instrument. Finally, we suggest that alternative test development procedures (many from older traditions within emotions or social intelligence fields) may lead to promising new directions for the emerging sub-discipline of emotional intelligence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Orchard, B., MacCann, C., Schulze, R., Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). New Directions and Alternative Approaches to the Measurement of Emotional Intelligence (pp. 321–344). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88370-0_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free