Seminal roots of wild and cultivated barley differentially respond to osmotic stress in gene expression, suberization, and hydraulic conductivity

48Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Wild barley, Hordeum vulgare spp. spontaneum, has a wider genetic diversity than its cultivated progeny, Hordeum vulgare spp. vulgare. Osmotic stress leads to a series of different responses in wild barley seminal roots, ranging from no changes in suberization to enhanced endodermal suberization of certain zones and the formation of a suberized exodermis, which was not observed in the modern cultivars studied so far. Further, as a response to osmotic stress, the hydraulic conductivity of roots was not affected in wild barley, but it was 2.5-fold reduced in cultivated barley. In both subspecies, osmotic adjustment by increasing proline concentration and decreasing osmotic potential in roots was observed. RNA-sequencing indicated that the regulation of suberin biosynthesis and water transport via aquaporins were different between wild and cultivated barley. These results indicate that wild barley uses different strategies to cope with osmotic stress compared with cultivated barley. Thus, it seems that wild barley is better adapted to cope with osmotic stress by maintaining a significantly higher hydraulic conductivity of roots during water deficit.

References Powered by Scopus

Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies

16373Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments

9660Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts

3901Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Root plasticity under abiotic stress

228Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Root hydraulic phenotypes impacting water uptake in drying soils

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Genetic control of root plasticity in response to salt stress in maize

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kreszies, T., Eggels, S., Kreszies, V., Osthoff, A., Shellakkutti, N., Baldauf, J. A., … Schreiber, L. (2020). Seminal roots of wild and cultivated barley differentially respond to osmotic stress in gene expression, suberization, and hydraulic conductivity. Plant Cell and Environment, 43(2), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13675

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

69%

Researcher 7

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33

79%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

19%

Mathematics 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free