Sequential designs for ordinal phase I clinical trials

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials which incorporate maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) as data accrue are inherently problematic because of limited data for estimation early on. We address this problem for small phase I clinical trials with ordinal responses. In particular, we explore the problem of the nonexistence of the MLE of the logistic parameters under a proportional odds model with one predictor.We incorporate the probability of an undetermined MLE as a restriction, as well as ethical considerations, into a proposed sequential optimal approach, which consists of a start-up design, a follow-on design and a sequential dose-finding design. Comparisons with nonparametric sequential designs are also performed based on simulation studies with parameters drawn from a real data set. © 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

References Powered by Scopus

Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology

553Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer phase I clinical trials: Efficient dose escalation with overdose control

492Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adaptive designs for dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity response

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Review of Modern Computational Algorithms for Bayesian Optimal Design

214Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sequential Monte Carlo for Bayesian sequentially designed experiments for discrete data

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementing Optimal Designs for Dose–Response Studies Through Adaptive Randomization for a Small Population Group

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, G., Rosenberger, W. F., & Haines, L. M. (2009). Sequential designs for ordinal phase I clinical trials. Biometrical Journal, 51(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200800192

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 3

43%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

29%

Decision Sciences 1

14%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free