Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review and compare the image quality and radiation dose of split-bolus single-pass computed tomography(CT) in the assessment of trauma patients in comparison to standard multi-phase CT techniques. Methods: An online electronic database was searched using the MESH terms “split-bolus,” “dual phase,” and “single pass.” Inclusion criteria required the research article to compare a split contrast bolus protocol in a single-pass scan in the assessment of trauma patients. Studies using split-bolus CT technique in non-traumatic injury assessment were excluded. Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Conclusions: Parenchymal and vascular image qualities, as well as subjective image quality assessments, were equal or superior in comparison to non-split-bolus multi-phase trauma CT protocols. Split-bolus single-pass CT decreased radiation exposure in all studies. Further research is required to determine the superior split-bolus protocol and the specificity and sensitivity of detecting blunt cerebrovascular injury screening, splenic parenchymal vascular lesions, and characterization of pelvic vascular extravasation.
CITATION STYLE
Jeavons, C., Hacking, C., Beenen, L. F., & Gunn, M. L. (2018). A review of split-bolus single-pass CT in the assessment of trauma patients. Emergency Radiology, 25(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1591-1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.