Evaluation of an automatic intraluminal edge detection technique for intravascular ultrasound images

11Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging enables detailed analysis and precise measurements of vascular cross-sections. However, to achieve a reduction in the existing level of observer variability requires the development of quantitative IVUS. We have developed a fully automatic intraluminal edge detection technique, based on adaptive active contour models and called ADDER (adaptive damping dependent on echographic regions) that allows the quantitation of the intraluminal cross-sectional area (ICSA). Using a 30-MHz mechanically rotated transducer mounted at the tip of a 3.5-F catheter, 58 normal and pathologic arterial segments (from coronary, renal, splenic, iliac, and carotid arteries) were imaged in vitro. These images were analyzed by 2 experts, E1 and E2, who manually traced the intraluminal contour twice for each image, as well as with ADDER. Intra-observer variabilities for ICSAs were found to be excellent (-1.454±3.51% for E1, 0.96±5.4% for E2). The inter-observer variability was 2.1±4.3%. The success factor for ADDER was 89%. Its intra-observer variability was null, as the method always finds a unique contour. The correlation between the automatically detected ICSA and the manual ICSA was: r=0.99 (y= 1.03x+0.89 mm2). Morphometric variations between manually and automatically traced contours, analyzed by the centerline method, were 100±140 mm on average. In conclusion, the ADDER automatic contour detection applied to IVUS images is robust and characterized by small systematic and random errors; therefore, quantitative IVUS is a useful tool in clinical research trials.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Finet, G., Maurincomme, E., Reiber, J. H. C., Savalle, L., Magnin, I., & Beaune, J. (1998). Evaluation of an automatic intraluminal edge detection technique for intravascular ultrasound images. Japanese Circulation Journal, 62(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1253/jcj.62.115

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free