Reframing biometric surveillance: from a means of inspection to a form of control

15Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper reviews the social scientific literature on biometric surveillance, with particular attention to its potential harms. It maps the harms caused by biometric surveillance, traces their theoretical origins, and brings these harms together in one integrative framework to elucidate their cumulative power. Demonstrating these harms with examples from the United States, the European Union, and Israel, I propose that biometric surveillance be addressed, evaluated and reframed as a new form of control rather than simply another means of inspection. I conclude by delineating three features of biometric technologies—complexity, objectivity, and agency—that demonstrate their social power and draw attention to the importance of studying biometric surveillance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marciano, A. (2019). Reframing biometric surveillance: from a means of inspection to a form of control. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9493-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free