Blood and urine cadmium, blood pressure, and hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

150Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Cadmium exposure has been inconsistently related to blood pressure. Objectives: We updated and reevaluated the evidence regarding the relationships of blood cadmium (BCd) and urine cadmium (UCd) with blood pressure (BP) and hypertension (HTN) in nonoccupationally exposed populations. Data sources and extraction: We searched PubMed and Web of Science for articles on BCd or UCd and BP or HTN in nonoccupationally exposed populations and extracted information from studies that provided sufficient data on population, smoking status, exposure, outcomes, and design. Data synthesis: Twelve articles met inclusion criteria: eight provided data adequate for comparison, and five reported enough data for meta-analysis. Individual studies reported significant positive associations between BCd and systolic BP (SBP) among nonsmoking women [β = 3.14 mmHg per 1 μg/L untransformed BCd; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-6.14] and among premenopausal women (β = 4.83 mmHg per 1 nmol/L log-transformed BCd; 95% CI, 0.17-9.49), and between BCd and diastolic BP (DBP) among women (β = 1.78 mmHg comparing BCd in the 90th and 10th percentiles; 95% CI, 0.64-2.92) and among premenopausal women (β = 3.84 mmHg per 1 nmol/L log-transformed BCd; 95% CI, 0.86-6.82). Three meta-analyses, each of three studies, showed positive associations between BCd and SBP (p = 0.006) and DBP (p < 0.001) among women, with minimal heterogeneity (I2 = 3%), and a significant inverse association between UCd and HTN among men and women, with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 80%). Conclusion: Our results suggest a positive association between BCd and BP among women; the results, however, are inconclusive because of the limited number of representative population-based studies of never-smokers. Associations between UCd and HTN suggest inverse relationships, but inconsistent outcome definitions limit interpretation. We believe a longitudinal study is merited.

References Powered by Scopus

The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?

8078Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem

1967Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: Implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements

1594Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents

2595Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scientific Opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food

0
803Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cadmium toxicity and treatment

476Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gallagher, C. M., & Meliker, J. R. (2010, December). Blood and urine cadmium, blood pressure, and hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002077

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 60

71%

Researcher 12

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 32

46%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17

25%

Environmental Science 13

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free