Towards optimum smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy: a household model to explore cost-effectiveness

3Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Previous economic evaluations of smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women are limited to single components, which do not in isolation offer sufficient potential impact to address smoking cessation targets. To inform the development of more appropriate complex interventions, we (1) describe the development of the Economics of Smoking in Pregnancy: Household (ESIP.H) model for estimating the life-time cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions aimed at pregnant women and (2) use a hypothetical case study to demonstrate how ESIP.H can be used to identify the characteristics of optimum smoking cessation interventions. Methods: The hypothetical intervention was based on current evidence relating to component elements, including financial incentives, partner smoking, intensive behaviour change support, cigarettes consumption and duration of support to 12 months post-partum. ESIP.H was developed to assess the life-time health and cost impacts of multi-component interventions compared with standard National Health Service (NHS) care in England. ESIP.H considers cigarette consumption, partner smoking and some health conditions (e.g. obesity) that were not included in previous models. The Markov model's parameters were estimated based on published literature, expert judgement and evidence-based assumptions. The hypothetical intervention was evaluated from an NHS perspective. Results: The hypothetical intervention was associated with an incremental gain in quitters (mother and partner) at 12 months postpartum of 249 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 195–304] per 1000 pregnant smokers. Over the long-term, it had an incremental negative cost of £193 (CI = –£779 to 344) and it improved health, with a 0.50 (CI = 0.36–0.69) increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for mothers, partners and offspring, with a 100% probability of being cost-effective. Conclusions: The Economics of Smoking in Pregnancy: Household model for estimating cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions aimed at pregnant women found that a hypothetical smoking cessation intervention would greatly extend reach, reduce smoking and be cost-effective.

References Powered by Scopus

Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 Years' observations on male British doctors

2684Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance

2662Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years' observations on male British doctors

1768Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Supporting pregnant women not ready to quit smoking: an economic evaluation

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A scoping review of costing methodologies used to assess interventions for underserved pregnant people and new parents

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Equity in national healthcare economic evaluation guidelines: Essential or extraneous?

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saygın Avşar, T., Jackson, L., Barton, P., Jones, M., & McLeod, H. (2022). Towards optimum smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy: a household model to explore cost-effectiveness. Addiction, 117(10), 2707–2719. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15955

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 6

75%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 3

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

22%

Psychology 2

22%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

22%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free