Examination of Digital Forensics Software Tools Performance: Open or Not?

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The performance evaluation in terms of digital forensics tools and software can be characterized as challenging research area due to constant development of technology in the digital world and rise of various manners in which it can be utilized for illegal purposes. There are many developed tools and software for digital forensics, some of them available for a license, and some of them free of charge. However, given that some practitioners from this field argue for commercial while others for open-source software, the reliability of the digital evidence which is collected, analyzed, and presented by both is constantly questioned. Motivated by the dilemma which tool or software for extracting digital evidence to use, we have conducted the review of the existing studies which directed us towards the examination of the performance of two different types of digital forensics tools: Open-source (Linux Autopsy Sleuth Kit) and commercial (Magnet Axiom). The results of the research showed that the open-source digital forensics tool has better performance in comparison to the commercial one. In addition to this conclusion which can be useful for further investigations and research in both practical digital forensics and academic community, we also provide open issues to be addressed in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dizdarević, A., Baraković, S., & Baraković Husić, J. (2020). Examination of Digital Forensics Software Tools Performance: Open or Not? In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 83, pp. 442–451). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24986-1_35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free