Transfer learning for causal sentence detection

16Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We consider the task of detecting sentences that express causality, as a step towards mining causal relations from texts. To bypass the scarcity of causal instances in relation extraction datasets, we exploit transfer learning, namely ELMO and BERT, using a bidirectional GRU with self-attention (BIGRUATT) as a baseline. We experiment with both generic public relation extraction datasets and a new biomedical causal sentence detection dataset, a subset of which we make publicly available. We find that transfer learning helps only in very small datasets. With larger datasets, BIGRUATT reaches a performance plateau, then larger datasets and transfer learning do not help.

References Powered by Scopus

Long Short-Term Memory

76931Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation

11647Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Position-aware attention and supervised data improve slot filling

766Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A survey on extraction of causal relations from natural language text

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A survey of the extraction and applications of causal relations

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using transfer learning-based causality extraction to mine latent factors for Sjögren's syndrome from biomedical literature

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kyriakakis, M., Androutsopoulos, I., Ginés i Ametllé, J., & Saudabayev, A. (2019). Transfer learning for causal sentence detection. In BioNLP 2019 - SIGBioMed Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the 18th BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task (pp. 292–297). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w19-5031

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

59%

Researcher 14

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 42

76%

Linguistics 7

13%

Social Sciences 3

5%

Engineering 3

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0