Proofs, proofs, proofs, and proofs

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In logic there is a clear concept of what constitutes a proof and what not. A proof is essentially defined as a finite sequence of formulae which are either axioms or derived by proof rules from formulae earlier in the sequence. Sociologically, however, it is more difficult to say what should constitute a proof and what not. In this paper we will look at different forms of proofs and try to clarify the concept of proof in the wider meaning of the term. This has implications on how proofs should be represented formally. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kerber, M. (2010). Proofs, proofs, proofs, and proofs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6167 LNAI, pp. 345–354). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14128-7_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free