Rigid registration of 3D ultrasound and MRI: Comparing two approaches on nine tumor cases

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We present a new technique for registering ultrasound and magnetic resonance (MR) images in the context of neurosurgery. It involves generating a pseudo-ultrasound (pseudo-US) from a segmented MR image and uses cross-correlation as the cost function to register with ultrasound. The algorithm's performance is compared to a state-of-the-art technique that uses a median filtered MR images to register with a Gaussian-blurred ultrasound using normalized mutual information (NMI). The two methods are tested on nine tumor cases, including both high- and low-grade gliomas. The pseudo-US method yielded significantly better alignment average than that obtained by NMI (p = 0.0009). If one case where NMI failed is excluded, the mean distance obtained by the pseudo-US approach (2.6 mm) is slightly lower than the one obtained by NMI (2.8mm), but not significantly so (p = 0.16). We conclude that the pseudo-US method is more robust for these cases. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mercier, L., Fonov, V., Del Maestro, R. F., Petrecca, K., Østergaard, L. R., & Collins, D. L. (2010). Rigid registration of 3D ultrasound and MRI: Comparing two approaches on nine tumor cases. In Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing (Vol. 83, pp. 33–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16259-6_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free