Mobilization and Rehabilitation Practice in ICUs During the COVID-19 Pandemic

16Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Mobilization and acute rehabilitation are essential in the intensive care unit (ICU), with substantial evidence supporting their benefits. This study aimed to characterize ICU mobilization practices during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients with and without COVID-19. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of an international point prevalence study. All ICUs across the world were eligible to participate and were required to enroll all patients in each ICU on the survey date, 27 January 2021. The primary outcome was the achievement of mobilization at the level of sitting over the edge of the bed. Independent factors associated with mobilization, including COVID-19 infection, were analyzed by multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 135 ICUs in 33 countries participated, for inclusion of 1229 patients. Among patients who were not receiving mechanical ventilation (MV), those with COVID-19 infection were mobilized more than those without COVID-19 (60% vs. 34%, p < 0.001). Among patients who were receiving MV, mobilization was low in both groups (7% vs. 9%, p =.56). These findings were consistent irrespective of ICU length of stay. Multivariable analysis showed that COVID-19 infection was associated with achievement of mobilization in patients without (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.71-7.42) and with MV (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.00-4.51). Factors that prevented mobilization were prone positioning in patients without MV and continuous use of neuromuscular blockade and sedation agents in patients with MV, whereas facilitating factors were the presence of targets/goals in both groups. Conclusion: Mobilization rates for ICU patients across the globe are severely low, with the greatest immobility observed in mechanically ventilated patients. Although COVID-19 is not an independent barrier to the mobilization of patients with or without MV, this study has highlighted the current lack of mobility practice for all ICU patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. (299 words)

References Powered by Scopus

Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics

13311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU

2286Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations

1121Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: A review from molecular mechanisms to its impact in COVID-2019

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functional Recovery Groups in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients and Their Associated Factors: From ICU to Hospital Discharge∗

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, K., Nakamura, K., Kudchadkar, S. R., Katsukawa, H., Nydahl, P., Ely, E. W., … Nishida, O. (2022). Mobilization and Rehabilitation Practice in ICUs During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 37(9), 1256–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666221097644

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Researcher 2

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

36%

Social Sciences 3

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

27%

Chemical Engineering 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free