Ethics in neuroscience curricula: A survey of Australia, Canada, Germany, the UK, and the US

12Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper analyses ethical training in neuroscience curricula at universities in Australia, Canada, Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom. The main findings are that 52 % of all courses have ethical training available, while in 82 % of those cases, the training is mandatory. In terms of specific contents of the teaching, ethical issues about 'animal subjects and human participation in research', 'scientific misconduct', and 'treatment of data' were the most prominent. A special emphasis during the research was placed on the prevalence of dual-use bioethics. In total, only 3 % of all courses mention it in any of their modules. One of the major findings of the survey was the trend towards 'mainstreaming' ethics education particularly in the UK, which is to disperse ethics among the various modules within the education instead of relying on a single ethics module. The paper discusses the utility of this approach for science education as well as describes the overall difficulties that course coordinators face when trying to teach ethics based on the responses to the qualitative part to the survey. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walther, G. (2013). Ethics in neuroscience curricula: A survey of Australia, Canada, Germany, the UK, and the US. Neuroethics, 6(2), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9168-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free