Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: What are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study

9Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes. Design Cohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1 year. Setting International (six countries, three continents) multicentre study. Participants 281 patients aged ≥70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures. Interventions Treatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy. Outcome measures Primary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life. Results Patients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p<0.001). Analysing individual MAEs, this was significant for pneumonia (GFC: 9.2%; UCC: 2.9%; OR, 3.40 (95% CI 1.08 to 10.70), p=0.027) and delirium (GFC: 11.3%; UCC: 2.2%, OR, 5.76 (95% CI 1.64 to 20.23), p=0.002). Conclusions Contrary to our study hypothesis, the rate of MAEs was higher in GFCs than in UCCs. Delirium was revealed as a main contributor. Most likely, this was based on improved detection rather than a truly elevated incidence, which we interpret as positive effect of geriatric comanagement. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blauth, M., Joeris, A., Rometsch, E., Espinoza-Rebmann, K., Wattanapanom, P., Jarayabhand, R., … Gosch, M. (2021). Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: What are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study. BMJ Open, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free