Objectives: We examine whether perceived discrimination in older adults is associated with external con?ict (anger-out) and internally directed anger (anger-in), as well as how subjective social poweras indicated by a sense of personal control and subjective social statusmodifes these associations while holistically controlling for time-stable confounds and the fve major dimensions of personality. Method: The 2006 and 2008 psychosocial subsamples of the Health and Retirement Study were combined to create baseline observations, and the 2010 and 2012 waves were combined to create follow-up observations. Responses were analyzed with random-effects models that adjust for repeated observations and fxed-effects models that additionally control for all time-stable confounds. Results: Discrimination was signifcantly associated with anger-in and anger-out. Fixed-effects models and controls for personality reduced these associations by more than 60%, although they remained signifcant. Measures of subjective social power weaken associations with anger-out but not anger-in. Discussion: The mental health consequences of perceived discrimination for older adults may be over-estimated if timestable confounds and personality are not taken into account. Subjective social power can protect victims of discrimination from reactions that may escalate conflict, but not from internalized anger that is likely to be wearing and cause further health problems.
CITATION STYLE
Lee, Y., & Bierman, A. (2018). A Longitudinal Assessment of Perceived Discrimination and Maladaptive Expressions of Anger among Older Adults: Does Subjective Social Power Buffer the Association? Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(8), e120–e130. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw110
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.