Representing meaning in mind: When predicate argument structures meet mental representations

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study has as a central focus the role that pre-linguistic non- verbal information plays in the construction of meaning. More specifically this study explores the role that mental representations - triggered by exposure to "visual sentences" - play on the understanding of written sentences describing them. Ninety-four university graduate and undergraduate students participated in this experimental study characterized by wo modalities (plausible vs. implausible) and four different conditions allowing for the matching up of each visual sentence (Image) with the written sentence (Text) describing it (or not). The results, which are meant to measure (1) the length of time that each participant took to decide whether or not the written sentence described the visual one, and (2) the number of errors that occurred during this decision making process, show that the length of time was shorter when both the visual and the written sentence were plausible. More errors occurred when the written text describing the visual sentence was implausible. © 2011 Springer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Volpe, R. (2011). Representing meaning in mind: When predicate argument structures meet mental representations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6456 LNCS, pp. 165–179). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18184-9_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free