Leaving only question-marks: Geographies of Rule in modern Yemen

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The juxtaposition of these seemingly unrelated moments in Britain’s colonial history, the trial of Warren Hastings and a conversation with Imam Ahmad concerning the borders of Britain’s Aden Protectorate, is meant to suggest the importance of geography in the constitution of the state and its object of rule. As Burke realized even then, colonial rule was predicated on a geographical imagination that marked off spaces as modern and pre-modern and, therefore, justified particular forms of government. In South Yemen, the British quite consciously placed Aden and its hinterland under separate forms of rule based on a distinction between city and tribe. But as Imam Ahmad’s statement indicates, the Zaydi Imamate of the Yemeni highlands was no less obsessed with space, albeit of a very different kind.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Willis, J. M. (2004). Leaving only question-marks: Geographies of Rule in modern Yemen. In Counter-Narratives: History, Contemporary Society, and Politics in Saudi Arabia and Yemen (pp. 119–149). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981318_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free