Selection without replicators: The origin of genes, and the replicator/interactor distinction in etiobiology

4Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Genes are thought to have evolved from long-lived and multiply-interactive molecules in the early stages of the origins of life. However, at that stage there were no replicators, and the distinction between interactors and replicators did not yet apply. Nevertheless, the process of evolution that proceeded from initial autocatalytic hypercycles to full organisms was a Darwinian process of selection of favourable variants. We distinguish therefore between Neo-Darwinian evolution and the related Weismannian and Central Dogma divisions, on the one hand, and the more generic category of Darwinian evolution on the other. We argue that Hull's and Dawkins' replicator/interactor distinction of entities is a sufficient, but not necessary, condition for Darwinian evolution to take place. We conceive the origin of genes as a separation between different types of molecules in a thermodynamic state space, and employ a notion of reproducers. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilkins, J. S., Stanyon, C., & Musgrave, I. (2012). Selection without replicators: The origin of genes, and the replicator/interactor distinction in etiobiology. Biology and Philosophy, 27(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9298-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free