Contrasting effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors on reward and aversive olfactory memories in the honey bee

18Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Much of what we have learnt from rodent models about the essential role of epigenetic processes in brain plasticity has made use of aversive learning, yet the role of histone acetylation in aversive memory in the honey bee, a popular invertebrate model for both memory and epigenetics, was previously unknown. We examined the effects of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition on both aversive and reward olfactory associative learning in a discrimination proboscis extension reflex (PER) assay. We report that treatment with the HDAC inhibitors APHA compound 8 (C8), phenylbutyrate (PB) or sodium butyrate (NaB) impaired discrimination memory due to impairment of aversive memory in a dose-dependent manner, while simultaneously having no effect on reward memory. Treatment with C8 1 h before training, 1 h after training or 1 h before testing, impaired aversive but not reward memory at test. C8 treatment 1 h before training also improved aversive but not reward learning during training. PB treatment only impaired aversive memory at test when administered 1 h after training, suggesting an effect on memory consolidation specifically. Specific impairment of aversive memory (but not reward memory) by HDAC inhibiting compounds was robust, reproducible, occurred following treatment with three drugs targeting the same mechanism, and is likely to be genuinely due to alterations to memory as sucrose sensitivity and locomotion were unaffected by HDAC inhibitor treatment. This pharmacological dissection of memory highlights the involvement of histone acetylation in aversive memory in the honey bee, and expands our knowledge of epigenetic control of neural plasticity in invertebrates. © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Figures

  • Figure 1. The histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor compound 8 (C8) impairs aversive memory at test at doses 10 mM or greater. Bees were treated with 1 mM (A, D, G), 10 mM (B, E, H) or 20 mM (C, F, I) C8 or vehicle only, 1 h after training. Panels A–C show discrimination learning and memory, panels D–F show aversive learning and memory and panels G–I show reward learning and memory, during acquisition training (A1,A2,A3) and at the retention test. 1 mM: n C8 = 124, n vehicle = 89; 10 mM: n C8 = 80, n vehicle = 76; 20 mM n C8 = 80, n vehicle = 90. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
  • Figure 2. The HDAC inhibitor phenylbutyrate PB) impairs aversive memory at test at 10 mM but not 1 mM or 50 mM. Bees were treated with 1 mM (A, D, G), 10 mM (B, E, H) or 50 mM (C, F, I) C8 or vehicle only, 1 h after training. Panels A–C show discrimination learning and memory, panels D–F show aversive learning and memory and panels G–I show reward learning and memory, during acquisition training (A1,A2,A3) and at the retention test. 1 mM: n PB = 90, n vehicle = 90; 10 mM: n PB = 227, n vehicle = 227; 50 mM n PB = 90, n vehicle = 90. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
  • Figure 3. The HDAC inhibitor C8 impairs aversive memory but has no effect on reward memory. Bees were treated with 10 mM C8 or vehicle only, 1 h before training (A, D, G), 1 h after training (B, E, H); also shown in Figure 1, included here for comparison), or 1 h before testing (C, F, I). Panels A–C show discrimination learning and memory, panels D–F show aversive learning and memory and panels G–I show reward learning and memory, during acquisition training (A1,A2,A3) and at the retention test. 1 h before training: n C8 = 79, n vehicle = 64; 1 h after training: n C8 = 80, n vehicle = 76; 1 h before testing n C8 = 79, n vehicle = 72. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
  • Figure 4. The HDAC inhibitor PB impairs aversive memory but has no effect on reward memory. Bees were treated with 10 mM PB or vehicle only, 1 h before training (A, D), 1 h after training (B, E); also shown in Figure 2, included here for comparison), or 1 h before testing (C, F). Panels A–C show discrimination learning and memory, panels D–F show aversive learning and memory and panels G–I show reward learning and memory, during acquisition training (A1,A2,A3) and at the retention test. 1 h before training: n PB = 94, n vehicle = 93; 1 h after training: n PB = 176, n vehicle = 184; 1 h before testing n PB = 97, n vehicle = 95. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
  • Figure 5. The HDAC inhibitor sodium butyrate (NaB) impairs aversive memory at test at 20 mM but not 10 mM. Bees were treated with 10 mM (A, C, E) or 20 mM (B, D, F) NaB or vehicle only, 1 h before testing. Panels A and B show discrimination learning and memory, panels C and D show aversive learning and memory and panels E–F show reward learning and memory, during acquisition training (A1,A2,A3) and at the retention test. 10 mM: n NaB = 115, n vehicle = 125; 20 mM: n NaB = 52, n vehicle = 48. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
  • Figure 6. HDAC inhibitor treatment does not affect sucrose sensitivity or locomotor activity. Sucrose sensitivity (A): treatment with an HDAC inhibitor does not significantly alter sucrose sensitivity indices at age 6, 7, 8 or 9 d (p > 0.05). 10 mM C8 was used to test 6, 8 and 9 d bees, 10 mM PB was used to test 7 d bees. Mean sucrose sensitivity indices are shown. From left to right, n HDAC inhibitor = 52, 36, 63 and 40; n vehicle = 56, 56, 60 and 51. Locomotor activity (B, C): bees treated with HDAC inhibitor show no significant change in movement rate (B) or grooming behaviour (C) relative to controls. By experiment, PB: n HDAC inhibitor = 28; n vehicle = 28; C8: n HDAC inhibitor = 37; n vehicle = 38. PB bees were 7 d old, C8 bees were 8 d old. Box plots show medians, quartiles and ranges, with circles and asterisks indicating moderately and strongly outlying data points. No statistically significant effects of PB or C8 treatment were detected on average number of line crossings per minute (p = 0.719, 0.254 respectively) or average number of head cleanings per minute (p = 0.718, 0.197 respectively).
  • Figure 7. Bees treated with caffeine have increased movement (A) and decreased grooming behaviour (B). By experiment, 7 d: n caffeine = 17, n vehicle = 16. Caffeine-treated bees had significantly fewer head cleanings per minute (p = 0.045) and showed a trend towards increased line crossings per minute (p = 0.074). * p < 0.05, ^ p < 0.10.
  • Figure 8. In this version of the proboscis extension reflex (PER) assay, discrimination learning increases linearly during training, and at the 24 h test approximately 2/3 of bees displayed the correct double response, indicating successful discrimination memory. Shown here are control bees from all experiments pooled (n = 902).

References Powered by Scopus

Anticancer activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors

2672Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription

2509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

HDAC2 negatively regulates memory formation and synaptic plasticity

1409Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hidden in plain view: Degeneracy in complex systems

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epigenetic code and insect behavioural plasticity

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epigenetic modifications acetylation and deacetylation play important roles in juvenile hormone action

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lockett, G. A., Wilkes, F., Helliwell, P., & Maleszka, R. (2014). Contrasting effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors on reward and aversive olfactory memories in the honey bee. Insects, 5(2), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5020377

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

71%

Researcher 5

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

39%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 11

35%

Neuroscience 6

19%

Psychology 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0