Fatigue design of Additive Manufacturing components through Topology Optimization: Comparison of methodologies based on the defect distribution and on the stress gradient

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, the fatigue design of AM components is addressed through Topology Optimization. Two defect-driven methodologies, which model the fatigue response in the finite life range and account for the experimental scatter, are compared. The first approach is based on the defect distribution and the marginal P-S-N curves. The second method models the size-effect by accounting for the stress distribution within the loaded material. The two approaches are used to assess the maximum allowable first principal stress, which causes crack propagation. As the fatigue strength depends on the component volume or the stress distribution, an iterative procedure is necessary to determine the optimal design. The optimal topologies of a cantilever beam and of an engine rod are determined and compared, showing that the defect-distribution method is the most conservative and the stress-gradient method can also be reliably applied in the case of uniform stress distribution, as in the engine rod. Furthermore, the choice of the volume to retain for the calculation of the fatigue strength in the defect-distribution method is critical.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boursier Niutta, C., Tridello, A., & Paolino, D. S. (2023). Fatigue design of Additive Manufacturing components through Topology Optimization: Comparison of methodologies based on the defect distribution and on the stress gradient. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 46(9), 3429–3445. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.14082

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free