Comparison of light, food, and temperature as environmental synchronizers of the circadian rhythm of activity in mice

Abstract

Although entrainment (and masking) of circadian rhythms by light has been extensively studied, much less attention has been given to other environmental cycles that can modulate circadian rhythms in mammals. In this study in mice, the entraining strength of different environmental cycles was compared. Running-wheel activity was monitored before, after, and while the animals were under one of four environmental cycles: a full light–dark cycle with 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness each day, a cycle of 1 h of light per day, a cycle of food availability consisting of 80 % of the baseline free-feeding amount presented once a day, and an ambient temperature cycle consisting of 23 h at 24 °C and 1 h at 12 °C each day. Four measures of zeitgeber strength were used: percentage of animals that entrained, rhythm robustness in the entrained state, stability of activity onsets, and stability of acrophases. The results indicate that, at least in mice, a full light–dark cycle is the most powerful modulator of the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity, as a consequence of both entrainment and masking. When entrainment alone is considered, temperature seems to be as strong a modulator as light, while food restriction is a weaker modulator and affects primarily a food-anticipatory component of the activity rhythm.