Clinical Considerations of Episcleritis and Scleritis: The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Experience

  • Foster C
  • de la Maza M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Because episcleritis and scleritis are entities encountered infrequently in general ophthalmic practice, the diagnosis and subsequent treatment may be missed or delayed because of the relative lack of experience in their detection and management. Fraunfelder and Watsonl reported that in a series of 30 enucleated eyes (sent from hospitals from all parts of Great Britain) with a primary histological diagnosis of scleritis, the clinical diagnosis of scleritis had been missed in 12 (40%), often because the scleritis was masked by multiple complications such as uveitis, glaucoma, and keratolysis. Many of these 12 eyes had not received antiinflammatory treatment and many of the 18 eyes affected by clinical scleritis had received insufficient antiinflammatory treatment. The main reason for enucleation was pain with loss of vision. Many of these patients had had the ocular inflammation for up to 30 years before the enucleation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foster, C. S., & de la Maza, M. S. (1994). Clinical Considerations of Episcleritis and Scleritis: The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Experience. In The Sclera (pp. 95–136). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2343-4_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free