Hemodynamic stability in total intravenous propofol anesthesia with midazolam coinduction versus general balanced anaesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Surbatovic M
  • Vesic Z
  • Djordjevic D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be a greater challenge for anesthesiologist than for surgeon if the patient is ASA III with concomitant cardiovascular diseases. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA - propofol with midazolam) and general balanced anesthesia (GBA - midazolam, thiopenton, nitrous oxide and O2) on hemodynamic stability in the ASA III patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods. In our study, 60 patients were randomized into two groups depending on whether they received TIVA or GBA. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure were monitored continuously and recorded in five time intervals. Results. Statistical analysis showed that TIVA with propofol provides better hemodynamic stability (less than 10% deviation from basal values for each measured parameter) then GBA group (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol provides better hemodynamic stability for ASA III patients with concomitant cardiovascular diseases then GBA.Uvod/Cilj. Iako se smatra da je laparoskopska holecistektomija (LH) minimalno invazivna procedura za hirurga, ona kod bolesnika sa pratecim kardiovaskularnim oboljenjima moze biti izazov za anesteziologa. Cilj naseg istrazivanja bio je da utvrdimo koji od dva primenjena metoda anestezije, totalna intravenska anestezija propofolom uz koindukciju midazolamom (TIVA) i opsta balansirana anestezija (OBA), obezbedjuje vecu hemodinamsku stabilnost tokom LH kod bolesnika koji pripadaju grupi III prema klasifikaciji Americkog drustva anesteziologa (ASA). Metode. Ispitivanje je obuhvatilo dve grupe po 30 bolesnika. Prva (TIVA) grupa bila je podvrgnuta LH u totalnoj intravenskoj anesteziji propofolom uz koindukciju midazolamom, a druga (OBA) u opstoj balansiranoj anesteziji (midazolam, tiopenton, azot-oksidul i kiseonik). U pet vremenskih intervala praceni su hemodinamski parametri: srcana frekvencija, sistolni, dijastolni i srednji arterijski pritisak. Rezultati. Stepen hemodinamske stabilnosti (odstupanje svakog parametra za manje od 10% od pocetnih vrednosti) postignut je u grupi TIVA kod svih bolesnika u svim vremenskim intervalima za razliku od OBA grupe (p < 0,01). Zakljucak. Totalna intravenska anestezija obezbedjuje mnogo bolju hemodinamsku stabilnost kod bolesnika grupe III prema klasifikaciji ASA sa pratecim kardiovaskularnim oboljenjima nego OBA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Surbatovic, M., Vesic, Z., Djordjevic, D., Radakovic, S., Zeba, S., Jovanovic, D., & Novakovic, M. (2012). Hemodynamic stability in total intravenous propofol anesthesia with midazolam coinduction versus general balanced anaesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Vojnosanitetski Pregled, 69(11), 967–972. https://doi.org/10.2298/vsp1211967s

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free