How are "teaching the teachers" courses in evidence based medicine evaluated? A systematic review

17Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Teaching of evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become widespread in medical education. Teaching the teachers (TTT) courses address the increased teaching demand and the need to improve effectiveness of EBM teaching. We conducted a systematic review of assessment tools for EBM TTT courses. To summarise and appraise existing assessment methods for teaching the teachers courses in EBM by a systematic review. Methods: We searched PubMed, BioMed, EmBase, Cochrane and Eric databases without language restrictions and included articles that assessed its participants. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Results: Of 1230 potentially relevant studies, five papers met the selection criteria. There were no specific assessment tools for evaluating effectiveness of EBM TTT courses. Some of the material available might be useful in initiating the development of such an assessment tool. Conclusion: There is a need for the development of educationally sound assessment tools for teaching the teachers courses in EBM, without which it would be impossible to ascertain if such courses have the desired effect. © 2010 Walczak et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walczak, J., Kaleta, A., Gabryś, E., Kloc, K., Thangaratinam, S., Barnfield, G., … Khan, K. S. (2010). How are “teaching the teachers” courses in evidence based medicine evaluated? A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-64

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

48%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

14%

Researcher 5

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 35

67%

Social Sciences 9

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

8%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free