Chinese Education Models in a Global Age: Myth or Reality?

10Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The extent to which a distinct Chinese education model can be identified is the subject of much debate. Among the many studies that approach the question, there is a tendency to be selective in elaborating the constituent elements of what could be viewed as a Chinese education model. Moreover, conceptualizations of Chinese education risk implying homogeneity in what can be more accurately understood as the overlapping of heterogeneous notions and practices in different educational contexts. By synthesizing evidence presented in this book and the research that has preceded it, this chapter aims to delineate the main aspects of what has been referred to as a Chinese education model. The chapter first argues that the Chinese education model is characterized by three attributes: dynamism, hybridity, and heterogeneity. It then makes the case that the Chinese education model can be more clearly understood by conceptually disaggregating it into its three key elements: norms, institutions, and individuals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spangler, J. (2016). Chinese Education Models in a Global Age: Myth or Reality? In Education in the Asia-Pacific Region (Vol. 31, pp. 337–354). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0330-1_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free