Technology sustainability assessment to support decision making on energy production at local scale

10Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Considering climate issues, the Kyoto Protocol is the most important worldwide reference aimed at reducing greenhouse gases that cause climate change; going further, the recent European Climate and Energy Policy defines binding targets for 2020, that include increasing use of renewable energy (wind, solar, biomass, etc.) to 20% of total energy production. In order to identify the most suitable strategies to achieve this objective, an evaluation of some relevant issues that can affect the sustainability of possible renewable energy options is necessary. This study focus on technology sustainability assessment of energy production from forest biomass, defining a set of indicators to provide a decision support system (DSS) for local decision makers, enabling them to evaluate the environmental impacts, the resource availability and renewability, the feasibility of the technology in the local context and the social acceptance of the plant among the local community. The case study presented in this article refers to an Italian mountain community (Comunità Montana delle Alpi Lepontine) in northern Italy, where the assessment of environmental, economic and social sustainability of a plant producing electricity powered by Syngas coming from gasification of forest biomass was performed. The aim of the research was to develop a multidisciplinary DSS to assess the feasibility of the application and to define guidelines for sustainability assessment of technologies for energy production using forest biomass, identifying critical issues and potential areas of optimization. © 2011 WIT Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sala, S., & Castellani, V. (2011). Technology sustainability assessment to support decision making on energy production at local scale. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 6(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V6-N3-251-267

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free