Focussing on tutoring skills instead of learners’ disadvantages in teenaged tutors’ training for intergenerational learning programmes

0Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the twenty-first century non-professional tutors, including teenagers, have an important role to play in the development of contemporary skills among the older population. Scholars in the field of older-age learning share a common belief that agespecific knowledge should be introduced and implemented when instructing older people. At the same time, psychologists warn that only perceived similarities between members of an in-group and out-group can reduce the age stereotypes they may hold. Therefore, focussing on age-specific knowledge in preparing teenaged tutors for instructing older individuals in the acquisition of e-skills would not support age-stereotype dilution in intergenerational programmes. An alternative idea is introduced by analysing the connections between geragogical principles and the nature of scaffolding assistance. It is proposed to focus on tutors’ scaffolding skills instead of older learners’ peculiarities when preparing teenaged tutors. The theoretically grounded idea will need to be validated by future empirical studies.

References Powered by Scopus

THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING

5403Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE)

1507Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Age-associated cognitive decline

899Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tambaum, T. (2019). Focussing on tutoring skills instead of learners’ disadvantages in teenaged tutors’ training for intergenerational learning programmes. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 10(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela20198

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

29%

Researcher 3

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 11

69%

Arts and Humanities 2

13%

Psychology 2

13%

Engineering 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free