Coverage and determinants of modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa: further analysis of demographic and health surveys

49Citations
Citations of this article
413Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The use of modern contraceptives (MC) in most African countries has been low despite the high fertility rate and unmet need for family planning. This study sought to determine the coverage and determinants of modern contraceptive use among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Methods: Data for the study were obtained from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted between 1995–2020 across 37 SSA countries. Women of reproductive age (15–49 years) was the unit of analysis. Analysis of data was done using STATA version 16 for windows. A bivariate Rao Scott’s Chi-square test of independence was done to determine factors associated with the use of modern contraceptives. Factors that showed significance (p < 0.05) were included in a multilevel logistic regression to determine significant predictors of modern contraceptives. Clustering, stratification and sample weighting were accounted for in the analyses. Results: The overall prevalence of the use of MC was found to be 22.0%. This ranged from 3.5% in the Central Africa Republic to 49.7% in Namibia. The most common type of MC used were injections (39.4%), condoms (17.5%) and implants (26.5%). Women were less likely to use modern contraceptive if they: had no education (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.38–0.44), had no children (aOR = 0.27–0.42), not told of family planning at a health facility (aOR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.67–0.71), not heard of family planning in the media (aOR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.74–0.79) and being poor (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.73–0.79). On the other hand, women were more likely to use modern contraceptive if they were between the age of 35–39 years (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.73–0.79), married (aOR = 2.66, 95% CI 2.50–2.83), had seven or more children (aOR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.17–0.38), had knowledge of any method of contraceptives (aOR = 303.8, 95% CI 89.9–1027.5) and when field worker visited and talked about family planning (aOR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.39–0.68). Conclusion: The study showed a low prevalence of modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa. Findings from the study highlight the need to provide education to women to increase uptake of modern contraceptive and also re-enforce contraceptive interventions to improve women’s health and well-being.

References Powered by Scopus

Investing in family planning: Key to achieving the sustainable development goals

264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contextual influences on modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa

172Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modern contraceptive use, unmet need, and demand satisfied among women of reproductive age who are married or in a union in the focus countries of the Family Planning 2020 initiative: a systematic analysis using the Family Planning Estimation Tool

136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Male partner influence on Women's choices and utilisation of family planning services in Mufulira district, Zambia

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors affecting utilization of modern contraceptive methods among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring the impact of COVID-19 social distancing measures on sexual health behaviours and access to HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for people living with HIV in Botswana

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boadu, I. (2022). Coverage and determinants of modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa: further analysis of demographic and health surveys. Reproductive Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01332-x

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2504590135180

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 71

70%

Researcher 23

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 52

44%

Medicine and Dentistry 41

34%

Social Sciences 17

14%

Environmental Science 9

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0