Study design: A questionnaire survey. Objectives: To evaluate the need for the introduction of quantitative diagnostic criteria for the traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS). Setting: An online questionnaire survey with participants from all over the world. Methods: An invitation to participate in an eight-item online survey questionnaire was sent to surgeon members of AOSpine International. Results: Out of 3340 invited professionals, 157 surgeons (5%) from 41 countries completed the survey. Whereas most of the respondents (75%) described greater impairment of the upper extremities than of the lower extremities in their own TCCS definitions, symptoms such as sensory deficit (39%) and bladder dysfunctions (24%) were reported less frequently. Initially, any difference in motor strength between the upper and lower extremities was considered most frequently (23%) as a disproportionate difference in power. However, after presenting literature review findings, the majority of surgeons (61%) considered a proposed difference of at least 10 points of power (based on the Medical Research Council scale) in favor of the lower extremities as an acceptable cutoff criterion for a diagnosis of TCCS. Most of the participants (40%) felt that applying a single criterion to the diagnosis of TCCS is insufficient for research purposes.Conclusion:Various definitions of TCCS were used by physicians involved in the spinal trauma care. The authors consider a difference of at least 10 motor score points between upper and lower extremity power a clear diagnostic criterion. For clinical research purposes, this diagnostic criterion can be considered as a face valid addendum to the commonly applied TCCS definition as introduced by Schneider et al. © 2010 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Van Middendorp, J. J., Pouw, M. H., Hayes, K. C., Williams, R., Chhabra, H. S., Putz, C., … Hosman, A. J. F. (2010). Diagnostic criteria of traumatic central cord syndrome. Part 2: A questionnaire survey among Spine specialists. Spinal Cord, 48(9), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.72
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.