Evaluating design concepts to support informal communication in hospitals through the development of a tool based on an iterative evaluation

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The evaluation of groupware systems is considered a complex activity, mainly due to the impact that this kind of tools could have in work practices, the multiples variables that influences the use and evaluation of them, as well as the expensive cost of time and resources required for an in situ evaluation. These reasons have complicated the generation of a generic guide for evaluating this type of tools. Some researchers in groupware evaluation have highlighted the need to evaluate groupware tools, according to the context and characteristics of those organizations in which these tools would be deployed. Thus, in this paper we present a process to evaluate a tool that supports informal collaboration in hospital. Due to nature of hospital work and the difficulty of performing an in situ evaluation, our proposal implies a multi-phase evaluation process through the development lifecycle of the tool. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mejia, D. A., Morán, A. L., Favela, J., Ochoa, S. F., & Pino, J. (2009). Evaluating design concepts to support informal communication in hospitals through the development of a tool based on an iterative evaluation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5619 LNCS, pp. 1013–1022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_116

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free