Clinical trial: Interferon alpha-2b continuous long-term therapy vs. repeated 24-week cycles for re-treating chronic hepatitis C

7Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Treatment options are limited for patients with hepatitis C virus who do not experience sustained viral eradication with pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy. Aim: To compare, in an open-label, randomized study, long-term continuous interferon alpha-2b treatment with repeated 24-week courses in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus that relapsed after prior interferon monotherapy. Methods: A total of 499 patients received 24 weeks of interferon alpha-2b, 3 MIU administered 3 TIW. Responders (normal alanine aminotransferase and negative hepatitis C virus -RNA, n = 244) were then randomized to continuous interferon therapy (1, 2 or 3 MIU TIW depending on response) or cyclical therapy (3 MIU TIW for 24 weeks per relapse). Mean Knodell inflammation (I + II + III) and necrosis (IV) scores at baseline vs. year 2 were compared. Results: Patients receiving continuous low-dose therapy vs. cycled therapy had larger reductions in inflammation (-3.9 vs. -3.1) and fibrosis (-0.49 vs. -0.24). Among both groups, the mean change was -3.4 for inflammation and -0.36 for fibrosis. Overall, 73% (95% CI: 67-79) of patients experienced reduced inflammation and 28% (95% CI: 22-34) had reduced fibrosis. Conclusions: Our results suggest hepatitis C virus patients experiencing viral suppression during long-term maintenance therapy with interferon demonstrate histological improvement. Further prospective trials testing this hypothesis are in progress. © 2008 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McHutchison, J. G., Patel, K., Schiff, E. R., Gitlin, N., Mur, R. E., Everson, G. T., … Albrecht, J. K. (2008). Clinical trial: Interferon alpha-2b continuous long-term therapy vs. repeated 24-week cycles for re-treating chronic hepatitis C. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 27(5), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03590.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free