Clinical judgement and therapeutic decision making

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.


Clinical decision making is under increased scrutiny due to concerns about the cost and quality of medical care. Variability in physician decision making is common, in part because of deficiencies in the knowledge base, but also due to the difference in physicians' approaches to clinical problem solving. Evaluation of patient prognosis is a critical factor in the selection of therapy, and careful attention to methodology is essential to provide reliable information. Randomized controlled clinical trials provide the most solid basis for the establishment of broad therapeutic principles. Because randomized studies cannot be performed to address every question, observational studies will continue to play a complementary role in the evaluation of therapy. Randomized studies in progress, meta analyses of existing data, and increased use of administrative and collaborative clinical data bases will improve the knowledge base for decision making in the future. © 1990.




Hlatky, M. A., Califf, R. M., Harrell, F. E., Lee, K. L., Mark, D. B., Muhlbaier, L. H., & Pryor, D. B. (1990). Clinical judgement and therapeutic decision making. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 15(1), 1–14.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free