A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of two novel desensitising dentifrices

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.


A comparison of the desensitising efficacy of two commercially available dentifrices with different modes of action was conducted in a randomised, examiner-blind, two-arm, parallel group, 8-week, longitudinal clinical study. Dentifrice A, (Sensodyne Multi Action Iso-Active), contained 50000 ppm KNO 3 and 1450 ppm fluoride as NaF. Dentifrice B, Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief, contained a combination of 80000 ppm arginine, bicarbonate, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluorine as NaMFP. Subjects ( N=110 ), stratified into two groups ( N=55 ), brushed twice-daily for 60 s, over an 8-week period. Sensitivity status, compliance, and safety were determined at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. A fixed-effects ANCOVA statistical model was applied to the Intent-To-Treat population using a two-sided 5% significance level. After 8 weeks, the treatment groups using Dentifrice A and Dentifrice B exhibited mean reductions from baseline of 49% and 45% in air sensitivity visual analogue scale (VAS) score, 61% (both) in examiner-based Schiff Sensitivity score, and clinically significant reductions in tactile pain threshold; all reductions were statistically significant ( P<0.0001 ). Both treatment groups also exhibited significant reductions across all sensitivity measures at 1, 2, and 4 weeks ( P≤0.0059 , Dentifrice A; P≤0.0137 , Dentifrice B).




Barlow, A. P., He, J., Tian, C., Jeffery, P., Mason, S. C., Tai, B. J., … Du, M. Q. (2012). A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of two novel desensitising dentifrices. International Journal of Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/896143

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free