Comparative study on typhoon's wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There are many models to predict natural phenomena around the world, but it is still difficult to accurately forecast the events. Many scientists, modeling professions, students, and researchers working on the tropical cyclones prediction, but they are encountered to many errors during compiling and configuring the models. Despite the increasing accuracy of weather forecasts, there is an element of uncertainty in all predictions. This paper reviews two methods used in my previous papers for predicting typhoon wind speed in the South China Sea, a dynamical model, Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF), and an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model. The performances of the models are calculated using statistical parameters of the root mean square error (RMSE) and Correlation Coefficient (CC), and the advantages and disadvantages of both models are represented. Regarding the statistical parameters values, the ANFIS model in comparison with the WRF model showed higher accuracy for typhoon intensity prediction because of higher CC and lower RMSE. The development of methods has represented several advanced techniques that their strengths and weaknesses have not been well-documented. In fact, a qualitative assessment and points to several ways in which the methods may be able to complement each other. The paper suggests that the scientists should improve the concepts of the models. • Investigating two different methods and their performance in predicting typhoon intensity. • Representing the strengths and weaknesses of both models. • Suggesting some solutions for future researches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haghroosta, T. (2019). Comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model. MethodsX, 6, 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.03.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free