Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy

13Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) are commonly used to assess mean currents and turbulence at energetic sites. Since 2014, five-beam ADCP configurations have become more common, but conventional analysis of turbulence properties is still based on the four-beam Janus configuration. We use measurements from a single site to investigate improved estimates of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) that are made possible by the addition of a fifth vertical beam. We conclude that four-beam estimates of TKE are suitable in most cases, and exhibit lower variance than five-beam estimates, but are more prone to contamination by wave activity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Togneri, M., Jones, D., Neill, S., Lewis, M., Ward, S., Piano, M., & Masters, I. (2017). Comparison of 4- and 5-beam acoustic Doppler current profiler configurations for measurement of turbulent kinetic energy. In Energy Procedia (Vol. 125, pp. 260–267). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.170

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free