BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 4D flow MR imaging is an emerging technique that allows visualization and quantification of 3D blood flow in vivo. However, representative studies evaluating its accuracy are lacking. Therefore, we compared blood flow quantification by using 4D flow MR imaging with US within the carotid bifurcation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two healthy volunteers (age 25.3±3.4 years) and 20 patients with≥50% ICA stenosis (age 67.7±7.4 years) were examined preoperatively and postoperatively by use of 4D flow MR imaging, with complete coverage of the left and right carotid bifurcation. Blood flow velocities were assessed with standardized 2D analysis planes distributed along the CCA and the ICA and were compared with US at baseline and postoperatively in patients. In addition, we tested reproducibility and interobserver agreement of 4D MR imaging in 10 volunteers. RESULTS: Overall, 101 CCAs and 79 ICAs were available for comparison. MR imaging underestimated (P
CITATION STYLE
Harloff, A., Zech, T., Wegent, F., Strecker, C., Weiller, C., & Markl, M. (2013). Comparison of blood flow velocity quantification by 4D flow mr imaging with ultrasound at the carotid bifurcation. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 34(7), 1407–1413. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3419
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.