A comprehensive review of interventions in the NOD mouse and implications for translation

236Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) animal models such as the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse have improved our understanding of disease pathophysiology, but many candidate therapeutics identified therein have failed to prevent/cure human disease. We have performed a comprehensive evaluation of disease-modifying agents tested in the NOD mouse based on treatment timing, duration, study length, and efficacy. Interestingly, some popular tenets regarding NOD interventions were not confirmed: all treatments do not prevent disease, treatment dose and timing strongly influence efficacy, and several therapies have successfully treated overtly diabetic mice. The analysis provides a unique perspective on NOD interventions and suggests that the response of this model to therapeutic interventions can be a useful predictor of the human response as long as careful consideration is given to treatment dose, timing, and protocols; more thorough investigation of these parameters should improve clinical translation. Copyright ©2005 by Elsevier Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shoda, L. K. M., Young, D. L., Ramanujan, S., Whiting, C. C., Atkinson, M. A., Bluestone, J. A., … Kreuwel, H. T. C. (2005, August). A comprehensive review of interventions in the NOD mouse and implications for translation. Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.08.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free