Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar Spine diseases: Past, present, and future

31Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A large number of interspinous process devices (IPD) have been recently introduced to the lumbar spine market as an alternative to conventional decompressive surgery in managing symptomatic lumbar spinal pathology, especially in the older population. Despite the fact that they are composed of a wide range of different materials including titanium, polyetheretherketone, and elastomeric compounds, the aim of these devices is to unload spine, restoring foraminal height, and stabilize the spine by distracting the spinous processes. Although the initial reports represented the IPD as a safe, effective, and minimally invasive surgical alternative for relief of neurological symptoms in patients with low back degenerative diseases, recent studies have demonstrated less impressive clinical results and higher rate of failure than initially reported. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview on interspinous implants, their mechanisms of action, safety, cost, and effectiveness in the treatment of lumbar stenosis and degenerative disc diseases. © 2014 Roberto Gazzeri et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gazzeri, R., Galarza, M., & Alfieri, A. (2014). Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar Spine diseases: Past, present, and future. BioMed Research International. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/975052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free